| |
|
Making Sense Out Of The Insanity Of Political Correctness
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
07/21/2010 Why is the NAACP and the Liberal Media Accusing Tea Party Patriots of Being Racist?
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Allen West: instititutional racism is dead
Allen West, a black Republican candidate for Congress running against incumbent Democrat Ron Klein, has been called a radical and an extremist but he showed a more moderate side in most of his speech about education at a voters' forum at the Fort Lauderdale Christian School Thursday night.
West, a retired lieutenant Army colonel who spent a year teaching at Deerfield Beach High School, called for more vocational education, internships, less teaching to the test, empowering teachers and encouraging community involvement in the schools. He has called for the end of the U.S. Department of Education -- a department he says has grown too much.
After he spoke about education, the mostly white crowd of more than 100 West supporters asked questions on a variety of topics. Here are a few quotes from West from the forum:
On West being called a radical:
"Once upon a time the British called the Founding Fathers radical," he said. "Today we call them Patriots."
On West's critics:
"There are spies out there. People have these folks called trackers. I invite them to come right down here up front. If you are going to publish something on a blog at least have the courage to look me in the eye."
On illegal immigration:
"Illegal immigration can have negative effects on our education system."
On taxes:
"We've got to transfer wealth out of Washington D.C. and back to each and every one of you," he said.
Oil spill:
"We cannot have a moratorium on oil drilling. ... We can't put these people in Louisiana out of work."
Race:
"I don't see myself as African-American, black American, I see myself as American," he said. "I'm very proud of the heritage of my parents, I am very proud of the heritage of my people. But when you stick a knife in me I bleed red, white and blue. ... Institutional racism in the U.S. is over."
Iraq:
"It's not about nation building. It's about being focused on the enemy. ... We'e got to kill the enemy. There is nothing wrong with saying that."
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Original Article URL
http://tinyurl.com/origina
West, a retired lieutenant Army colonel who spent a year teaching at Deerfield Beach High School, called for more vocational education, internships, less teaching to the test, empowering teachers and encouraging community involvement in the schools. He has called for the end of the U.S. Department of Education -- a department he says has grown too much.
After he spoke about education, the mostly white crowd of more than 100 West supporters asked questions on a variety of topics. Here are a few quotes from West from the forum:
On West being called a radical:
"Once upon a time the British called the Founding Fathers radical," he said. "Today we call them Patriots."
On West's critics:
"There are spies out there. People have these folks called trackers. I invite them to come right down here up front. If you are going to publish something on a blog at least have the courage to look me in the eye."
On illegal immigration:
"Illegal immigration can have negative effects on our education system."
On taxes:
"We've got to transfer wealth out of Washington D.C. and back to each and every one of you," he said.
Oil spill:
"We cannot have a moratorium on oil drilling. ... We can't put these people in Louisiana out of work."
Race:
"I don't see myself as African-American, black American, I see myself as American," he said. "I'm very proud of the heritage of my parents, I am very proud of the heritage of my people. But when you stick a knife in me I bleed red, white and blue. ... Institutional racism in the U.S. is over."
Iraq:
"It's not about nation building. It's about being focused on the enemy. ... We'e got to kill the enemy. There is nothing wrong with saying that."
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Original Article URL
http://tinyurl.com/origina
Going Green, What's That...
By Chris Newman
The phase, “Going Green.” Is a political ploy, which doesn’t have a specific definition. Still most people would describe it as being ecologically conservative. I would have to agree that Going Green does fit that broad description. What is a ecological conservative. Four words, “Waste Not, Want Not.” Being an ecological conservative is a great idea, further it is a great way to live your life.
That being said, ecological conservatism is not fanaticism. Many people who get into the so called “Green Movement,” are fanatics. They push the green agenda with unproven theories like Global Warming. Of course, now they no longer call it Global Warming, but Climate Change. They changed it because of the overwhelming evidence that fails to show that the earth is getting consistently warmer. So now it’s Climate Change. Those who promote the theory of Climate Change love that new phase. Why? Because it allows for a much broader and diverse change in the climate, that will still fit the definition of Climate Change.
Climate Change happens all around us. From day to day, month to month, and season to season. The climate is always in a state of change. A change driven by the rotation of the earth, the position of which the earth resides within its orbit of the sun. The sun without a doubt is the most abundant energy source that we have access to. The massive amount of energy placed upon the earth as a direct result of the sun, is a difficult thing to put into perspective. I will attempt to put it into everyday terms that will be easy to understand. I’ll start off with a scientific measurement of the energy the earth receives from the sun, and simplify it.
3,850,000 Exajoules, worth of energy is transmitted to the earth via light and heat from the sun alone. For comparisons, if you were to add up all the energy that is produced by man. By power plants, the burning of gasoline, oil, wood , coal, hydroelectric, wind, you name it. Through out the entire world it only comes to 487 Exajoules. That’s .0001264%, of the suns energy on earth, in other words it would take 791,139 planets. Each producing the same amount of energy that all of the man made energy that is produced combined. To equal just the amount of energy that the sun transmits to earth. Just a small fraction of 1% of a change in the energy received, would cause drastic changes in our climate. These small fractional changes happen all the time. Things which change this would include but not limited to. Cloud cover, reflective properties of the earth’s surface, and the angle of the continents to the sun. To the amount of pollution and or dust particulates in the atmosphere.
Clouds generally reside high within the earth’s atmosphere. With a high density of cloud cover, much less of the suns energy makes it all the way to the surface. A fraction of the energy gets reflected back into space, as if bouncing off of a mirror. The more extended periods of cloud cover, the cooler the earth would become.
On a bright shinny hot day. The suns energy in the form of light and heat interacts with the bodies of water. A small amount of that water is evaporated. As that evaporated moister rises into the atmosphere, it produces clouds. As those clouds condense, they produce rain. It’s all part of a cycle that continues regardless of human actions.
The angle at which the light rays from the sun striking the earth has the greatest affect on continental climate differences. The angle is what causes our seasons. In the summer time, in the northern hemisphere. The light from the sun has a much more direct angle of impact on the surface. Which causes the summertime heat. While the northern hemisphere enjoys summer the southern hemisphere experiences winter. Winter comes and goes, then spring, summer, and fall. All with out the influence or consent of people.
Another reason why there may have been a false appearance of a Global Warming through out the 80s, and 90s is smog. For those of you who are old enough to remember the 60s and 70s. Ask your parents, grandparents, or look up pictures or video from that time period, and compare it to the sky of the modern day. Those of you who are older. You might remember how hazy and dark the sky often was. This was due to cars and other combustion engines which had little to no smog reduction devices. The more polluted the sky (atmosphere) is, the less light and energy from the sun that reaches the surface of the planet.
In the late 70s and early 80s and all the way to this day. The laws that have been passed puts stricter and stricter regulations on the smog reduction requirements of automobiles and energy production facilities. As these restrictions increased. The amount of smog (pollution) released into the atmosphere decreased. As the amount of smog decreases, the amount of light and heat energy from the sun which makes it to the surface of the earth increases. As the light and heat energy hitting the earth increases, so does the temperature of the earth. Of course these heat changes are extremely small, a fraction of a degree to one degree average. And these are the size numbers the pro climate change crowds are talking about.
Man made Climate Change is an ideology that is unproven. Many scientists preach that theory as fact, many other scientist disagree that man could affect climate. Other’s just simply stay out of the argument.
Here is a simple question. If man made Climate Change is just an unproven theory, why do so many scientist adamantly study it? Well it’s simple. A small fraction of them really do believe it, but the majority of them do it as a means of receiving government grants. These grants not only keep these scientists employed and receiving an income, but also gives them the resources and finances needed to explore other scientific theories. All with the funds of the government, made up of tax payer dollars.
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
The phase, “Going Green.” Is a political ploy, which doesn’t have a specific definition. Still most people would describe it as being ecologically conservative. I would have to agree that Going Green does fit that broad description. What is a ecological conservative. Four words, “Waste Not, Want Not.” Being an ecological conservative is a great idea, further it is a great way to live your life.
That being said, ecological conservatism is not fanaticism. Many people who get into the so called “Green Movement,” are fanatics. They push the green agenda with unproven theories like Global Warming. Of course, now they no longer call it Global Warming, but Climate Change. They changed it because of the overwhelming evidence that fails to show that the earth is getting consistently warmer. So now it’s Climate Change. Those who promote the theory of Climate Change love that new phase. Why? Because it allows for a much broader and diverse change in the climate, that will still fit the definition of Climate Change.
Climate Change happens all around us. From day to day, month to month, and season to season. The climate is always in a state of change. A change driven by the rotation of the earth, the position of which the earth resides within its orbit of the sun. The sun without a doubt is the most abundant energy source that we have access to. The massive amount of energy placed upon the earth as a direct result of the sun, is a difficult thing to put into perspective. I will attempt to put it into everyday terms that will be easy to understand. I’ll start off with a scientific measurement of the energy the earth receives from the sun, and simplify it.
3,850,000 Exajoules, worth of energy is transmitted to the earth via light and heat from the sun alone. For comparisons, if you were to add up all the energy that is produced by man. By power plants, the burning of gasoline, oil, wood , coal, hydroelectric, wind, you name it. Through out the entire world it only comes to 487 Exajoules. That’s .0001264%, of the suns energy on earth, in other words it would take 791,139 planets. Each producing the same amount of energy that all of the man made energy that is produced combined. To equal just the amount of energy that the sun transmits to earth. Just a small fraction of 1% of a change in the energy received, would cause drastic changes in our climate. These small fractional changes happen all the time. Things which change this would include but not limited to. Cloud cover, reflective properties of the earth’s surface, and the angle of the continents to the sun. To the amount of pollution and or dust particulates in the atmosphere.
Clouds generally reside high within the earth’s atmosphere. With a high density of cloud cover, much less of the suns energy makes it all the way to the surface. A fraction of the energy gets reflected back into space, as if bouncing off of a mirror. The more extended periods of cloud cover, the cooler the earth would become.
On a bright shinny hot day. The suns energy in the form of light and heat interacts with the bodies of water. A small amount of that water is evaporated. As that evaporated moister rises into the atmosphere, it produces clouds. As those clouds condense, they produce rain. It’s all part of a cycle that continues regardless of human actions.
The angle at which the light rays from the sun striking the earth has the greatest affect on continental climate differences. The angle is what causes our seasons. In the summer time, in the northern hemisphere. The light from the sun has a much more direct angle of impact on the surface. Which causes the summertime heat. While the northern hemisphere enjoys summer the southern hemisphere experiences winter. Winter comes and goes, then spring, summer, and fall. All with out the influence or consent of people.
Another reason why there may have been a false appearance of a Global Warming through out the 80s, and 90s is smog. For those of you who are old enough to remember the 60s and 70s. Ask your parents, grandparents, or look up pictures or video from that time period, and compare it to the sky of the modern day. Those of you who are older. You might remember how hazy and dark the sky often was. This was due to cars and other combustion engines which had little to no smog reduction devices. The more polluted the sky (atmosphere) is, the less light and energy from the sun that reaches the surface of the planet.
In the late 70s and early 80s and all the way to this day. The laws that have been passed puts stricter and stricter regulations on the smog reduction requirements of automobiles and energy production facilities. As these restrictions increased. The amount of smog (pollution) released into the atmosphere decreased. As the amount of smog decreases, the amount of light and heat energy from the sun which makes it to the surface of the earth increases. As the light and heat energy hitting the earth increases, so does the temperature of the earth. Of course these heat changes are extremely small, a fraction of a degree to one degree average. And these are the size numbers the pro climate change crowds are talking about.
Man made Climate Change is an ideology that is unproven. Many scientists preach that theory as fact, many other scientist disagree that man could affect climate. Other’s just simply stay out of the argument.
Here is a simple question. If man made Climate Change is just an unproven theory, why do so many scientist adamantly study it? Well it’s simple. A small fraction of them really do believe it, but the majority of them do it as a means of receiving government grants. These grants not only keep these scientists employed and receiving an income, but also gives them the resources and finances needed to explore other scientific theories. All with the funds of the government, made up of tax payer dollars.
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Racism In America
By Chris Newman
Racism in this country and racism in the tea party is not an epidemic, as the NAACP would like people to believe. What is an epidemic in this country is the constant exploitation of the few racists individuals. To further the fear agenda that is pushed by rights groups. The exploitation of the fear of being called a racist. In 08 if you didn’t vote for Obama you were immediately called a racist, regardless of your reasoning. The exploitation of the persons of color and other minority's. Into having their mentality falsely altered into believing the lie of racism as an American white mainstream culture.
This racist perpetuation by organizations like the NAACP, Black Panthers, and yes the KKK. All set out to enrich their own pockets through the fear of racism. As racism diminishes in this country, these groups loose their power. Thus they loose their influence. In an effort to gain that power and influence back. They spread, exaggerate, and perpetuate the few acts of racism. Once again giving the impression of a mainstream epidemic. In an attempt to enrich their own pocket. All this is accomplished at the expense of racial harmony and diversity.
Yes my friends I am here to tell you we are heading towards an explosion of animosity. This animosity is a direct result of fear mongering. Derived from the likes of Martin Luther King wannabes, like Christopher 2X, Michael X, Zaki Baruti, and yes Obama. Zaki Baruti, along with many other rights activist. Perpetuate racial animosity by calling any black person who is a republican, an “uncle tom.” Listen for yourself here.
Although Zaki Baruti would like you to believe he is a equal rights activist, he is not. People like him cause more animosity and lack of diversity then the KKK. Reason being is, no reasonable person takes the KKK serious. Many people take equal rights activists serious, because they like the thought of equal right and ethnic diversity.
When you are called an uncle tom because you have different political beliefs. That not only shows Zaki Baruti’s dismay for diversity, but it is a slap in the face to the true ambassadors of diversity. Like Martin Luther King who gave his famous "I Have a Dream" speech and led the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Rosa Parks who was arrested for sitting in the wrong part of the bus, and later worked with civil rights organizations to start the Montgomery Bus Boycott and help end segregation on buses in the South. Abraham Lincoln who was President of the United States when the Southern states broke away from the country. He worked hard to keep the country together ended slavery after the Civil War.
Politicians use this animosity and lack of ethnic diversity to polarize the nation. They do this for the same reasons the wannabe equal rights activists of the modern day do what they do. Power and wealth is what they crave. A nation is made up of the people. A people divided, is weaker then they are united. Political figures know that racial and social differences can be used to create animosity. They will use this animosity to pit one group against another. Which ever group they think will be the strongest, that’s the group they will pander to. Promising them the collective wealth of the masses through entitlements and social programs. All in a disguised attempt at buying the votes necessary for them to be elected or stay elected.
Yes my friends, dark days are ahead of us if we as a nation can’t get these creators of animosity out of the lime light. Because of the first amendment, these people have every right to speak their minds. That leaves us with one strategy to bring their hate anti diversity influence to an end. We The People must also invoke our freedom of speech, and speak out in support for diversity, instead of animosity. We must stop voting for the power hungry politicians and vote for the leaders who truly believe in the power of the United States Constitution, and the rights and freedoms which it guarantees to all Americans. Regardless of color and race.
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Racism in this country and racism in the tea party is not an epidemic, as the NAACP would like people to believe. What is an epidemic in this country is the constant exploitation of the few racists individuals. To further the fear agenda that is pushed by rights groups. The exploitation of the fear of being called a racist. In 08 if you didn’t vote for Obama you were immediately called a racist, regardless of your reasoning. The exploitation of the persons of color and other minority's. Into having their mentality falsely altered into believing the lie of racism as an American white mainstream culture.
This racist perpetuation by organizations like the NAACP, Black Panthers, and yes the KKK. All set out to enrich their own pockets through the fear of racism. As racism diminishes in this country, these groups loose their power. Thus they loose their influence. In an effort to gain that power and influence back. They spread, exaggerate, and perpetuate the few acts of racism. Once again giving the impression of a mainstream epidemic. In an attempt to enrich their own pocket. All this is accomplished at the expense of racial harmony and diversity.
Yes my friends I am here to tell you we are heading towards an explosion of animosity. This animosity is a direct result of fear mongering. Derived from the likes of Martin Luther King wannabes, like Christopher 2X, Michael X, Zaki Baruti, and yes Obama. Zaki Baruti, along with many other rights activist. Perpetuate racial animosity by calling any black person who is a republican, an “uncle tom.” Listen for yourself here.
Although Zaki Baruti would like you to believe he is a equal rights activist, he is not. People like him cause more animosity and lack of diversity then the KKK. Reason being is, no reasonable person takes the KKK serious. Many people take equal rights activists serious, because they like the thought of equal right and ethnic diversity.
When you are called an uncle tom because you have different political beliefs. That not only shows Zaki Baruti’s dismay for diversity, but it is a slap in the face to the true ambassadors of diversity. Like Martin Luther King who gave his famous "I Have a Dream" speech and led the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Rosa Parks who was arrested for sitting in the wrong part of the bus, and later worked with civil rights organizations to start the Montgomery Bus Boycott and help end segregation on buses in the South. Abraham Lincoln who was President of the United States when the Southern states broke away from the country. He worked hard to keep the country together ended slavery after the Civil War.
Politicians use this animosity and lack of ethnic diversity to polarize the nation. They do this for the same reasons the wannabe equal rights activists of the modern day do what they do. Power and wealth is what they crave. A nation is made up of the people. A people divided, is weaker then they are united. Political figures know that racial and social differences can be used to create animosity. They will use this animosity to pit one group against another. Which ever group they think will be the strongest, that’s the group they will pander to. Promising them the collective wealth of the masses through entitlements and social programs. All in a disguised attempt at buying the votes necessary for them to be elected or stay elected.
Yes my friends, dark days are ahead of us if we as a nation can’t get these creators of animosity out of the lime light. Because of the first amendment, these people have every right to speak their minds. That leaves us with one strategy to bring their hate anti diversity influence to an end. We The People must also invoke our freedom of speech, and speak out in support for diversity, instead of animosity. We must stop voting for the power hungry politicians and vote for the leaders who truly believe in the power of the United States Constitution, and the rights and freedoms which it guarantees to all Americans. Regardless of color and race.
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
The Freedom Which Slips Silently Into The Past
By Chris Newman
Continental Congress on July 4, 1776 adopted the Declaration Of Independence. On August 2, 1776 it was signed. Then forwarded to King George III of the Britain Empire. The Declaration justified the independence of the United States by listing colonial grievances against King George III, and by asserting certain natural rights, including a right of revolution.
Having served its original purpose in announcing independence. Its stature grew over the years, particularly the second sentence, a sweeping statement of human rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
People now days want to use the second sentence of the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. To justify government entitlements. Many people who argue the whole government entitlement ideology even believe and teach that the second sentence to the Declaration Of Independence is part of the United States Constitution. They twist the phrase “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” As a guarantee that they will succeed in life, and if not by their merits, then the power of government.
Our founding fathers had a great idea for this country when they drafted the constitution. They set out to provide freedom from tyranny through the promotion of self- reliance. They realized what so many of us has forgotten. Freedom is not free. True freedom comes from ones ability and need to provide for themselves. In the past 80 or so years since F.D.R. and his liberal views was in office. There had been a steady increase in the size of government, and the willingness of the people to hand over a part of their freedom for a false sense of security. I have news for all the people who are looking for security through the government, don’t. It will never happen.
The government as a whole is a wasteful entity. If the government was a private business it would be out of business. The government and how its ran, should be an educational tool for all business students as a guide to how not to do business. The red tape alone, and the long drawn out process of legislation and fund appropriations is one of the biggest waists. Not to mention the waists of tax-payer funds through the ridiculous use of ear marks which so often get thrown into a bill in the 11th hour. It’s not only a waist of time but of limited tax payer money. Unfortunately that doesn’t seem to matter to those tax and spend government officials. Who as we all know mostly reside to the left of party lines. Unfortunately some of the little “r” republicans have forgotten their conservative values. These so called conservatives have traded a piece of our freedom for those ear marks, which most of the time benefit them more then their constituents.
I personally am saddened and a bit frightened as to where this county, and our freedom is going. America has for along time been a country the rest of the world could look up to. All that has drastically began to change. Maybe that’s what President Obama meant in his Campaign speeches when he spoke so often about change. Well my fellow Americans. Change is what we are getting, and it’s not a change for the good.
If we want this country to continue, and our freedoms to flourish. We must return to our grass roots conservatism. We must as Ronald Ragan said in a speech in the 60’s “have a revitalized conservative party.” Conservatism has worked in the past and it will work in the future. I think one of the biggest reasons that conservatism works so well is because of the belief in individual freedom and individual responsibility, along with a strong trust in a free market capitalist society.
Conservatives know that the government is not able to fix all of our problems. In fact, most of the problems that this country has is a result of government intrusion. Take for example the social security system. Although it was created with good intentions by the former President F.D.R. It is a failed and flawed program. As we all know the social security program is unsustainable. For this program to be sustainable it must bring in more tax-payer money then it is handing out in social security checks. As the baby boom generation gets to retirement age, the ratio of money coming into social security and the amount of money being paid out narrows. Before we know it there will be more paid out then collected. Also the government has caused this program to fail sooner then it would normally had, by the constant borrowing from the system to pay for various other pork barrel programs.
There are four basic cures to the Social Security crisis. Privatization, cutting benefits, raising taxes, and making it optional enrollment. We will start with privatization.
February 2005 Former President Bush released his proposal for a partial voluntary investment of Social Security taxes into the free market. His plan was not a fix, more like a band-aid on a festering wound. A more likely free market fix would be to invest all the money collected by the Social Security tax into the free market. But instead of it being invested as a whole. Have it invested more like a 401k. Where the individual tax payer has some say so over how it is invested, even though it is still moderated by the government.
Cutting benefits is probably the least favorite solution. Each consecutive generation would have to begin receiving benefits later in life, and with less of a benefit. In order for the Social Security system to stay financially neutral. The reason why is because each year the percentage of people receiving benefits grow quicker then the percentage of people paying into it. Cutting benefits is unsustainable.
Raising taxes in my opinion, is the most foolish solution. This scenario plays out much like cutting taxes, except at the opposite spectrum. In order for the Social Security system to stay financially neutral. The tax payers would have to pay higher, and higher taxes each year. Eventually your tax obligation would become so great that it would consume more of your pay check then you actually get to keep. Raising taxes is just like the above two options, an unsustainable band-aid solution.
The solution which I believe would be the ultimate solution, would be to make it optional enrollment. This would give choice and freedom to invest, or not to invest your money how you see fit. This choice would only be available to those who are currently paying into the system. Two choices, one to continue to pay into Social Security, and receive benefits as the law currently entails. Choice two, to opt out and surrender what you have already paid in with out any benefits from the system in the future. Allowing you to keep and invest your money for your future. The other part to this plan would be to eliminate the Social Security program to those who have never paid into the system. Giving the individual the responsibility and freedom to invest and provide for their own retirement future. Those who are currently receiving benefits would not be affected, their benefits would continue unchanged. Me myself even though I have paid into the Social Security program for 16 years as a full time employee, and a few more years part time. I would gladly stop paying into it so that I could invest my income the way I see fit.
It seems that each time a law is passed. Choices become a bit more limited, and freedoms a bit more scarce. It always starts off with the little things. For example: Seatbelts. We all should realize that in most circumstances if you are in a accident. Your chances of avoiding serious injuries or death would be better if you were to wear a seatbelt. As an adult, shouldn’t you be allowed to make the choice to utilize a seatbelt or not to use it. Me not using a seatbelt has no affect on the safety of other motorists. Still it is forced on us as if we are children. Unable to make the right choice. The helmet law. I ride a motorcycle, and wear a helmet every time I ride. Still it should be my choice. As an adult, shouldn’t I be the one to make that decision. After all, with or without a helmet it has no affect on the safety of others on the road. Trans-fats have been made illegal to be used in the restaurant industry. Why? Fast food everyday is bad for you. High fat foods too often is bad for you. We know that. Again we don’t need the government to be our parents.
Sure these examples are innocuous on the surface. Still they are designed to be a transitional buffer, used to disguise the slow degradation of our freedoms. Where does our giving up of our freedoms end? As the small aspects of our freedoms erode, and are replaced by the false sense of security by government. Larger less innocuous freedoms are being attacked. The freedom of barter and marketing. The government attacks these rights from a different angle. Mainly these attacks are covered up by the promotion of class and wealth envy.
We hear the phrase, “Less Fortunate.” All the time. “Those that have, those that don’t have.” What do they mean? I’m here to tell you they mean nothing. The majority of people that have, have because of the right decisions that they have made in their lives. The majority that don’t have, are poor because they chose not to take advantage of the American dream. Less Fortunate, that is the biggest deception devised by big government loving politicians.
What makes one person less fortunate then another? The answer. NOTHING. That is unless you were born in a socialist, or communist country. Here in America, by default you are fortunate to be an American. With the freedoms that go along with it. Some ignore their freedoms and responsibility to better themselves, and blame others for all of life’s problems. The promotion of class and wealth envy by the government makes this an easy way to not blame yourself, but to blame others. Not everyone can be rich. Not everyone can own a fancy car, and a three story mansion. With effort and diligence you can have a home, and the necessities of life. All without government intrusion, and entitlements.
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Tell Congress How Mad You Are With Them
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)